CHASE-ING MICROBES
  • Home
  • Recent News
  • Research Projects
  • Lab Members
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact

Microbial Diversity

9/10/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
Historically, ecologists and evolutionary biologists have sought to answer a central question:
Why do we find different types and numbers of species in different places?
​These processes governing community dynamics can be reduced to four main topics:
1. Selection - the environment selects for different species based on fitness differences
2. Ecological Drift - species abundances fluctuate at random due to demographic stochasticity
3. Dispersal - high dispersal will increase local diversity and decrease beta-diversity
4. Speciation - novel lineages can arise to increase species richness and beta-diversity
This is where adapting a biogeographic framework can be powerful. It allows us to assess the processes controlling the geographic distribution of species over space and time. It can incorporate ecological and environmental factors (e.g., temperature and precipitation) while also allowing for the integration of phylogeography to assess evolutionary processes (Figure). These ideas have a rich history in plant and animal communities and have lead to the develop of ground-breaking ecological theories attempting to explain species diversity and distribution (for some ecological background, see MacArthur-Wilson, Hubbell's Neutral Theory, and/or a nice synthesis by M Vellend).
In the past two decades, these patterns have largely been explored in microbial communities, reflecting the importance of selection of environmental conditions based on correlations between microbial composition and the environment. For instance, one of the first papers to really explore these patterns showed soil bacterial communities were highly influenced by pH [1]. However, there is a large disconnect between theoretical and empirical work conducted in plants and animals to microbes, as the former are studied at the species level and describe large-scale patterns of species’ distributions. By concentrating on finer-genetic resolutions (i.e., species and population levels) we can better detect the eco/evo processes contributing to the maintenance of microbial diversity [2].

Deterministic or Stochastic?!?!

For this section, I just want to highlight some processes that have been shown (in either bacteria or macroorganisms) to maintain species diversity. For the ease of this blog post, I will broadly separate these into two major categories, deterministic and stochastic processes. This, in no way comprehensive list is mainly derived from the amazing ecology grad course taught by my PhD advisor, Jennifer Martiny at UC Irvine.

Deterministic

1. Spatial (environmental) Heterogeneity
2. Niche (resource) Partitioning 
3. Predation  (top-down control)
4. Competition and Species Interactions
5. Pathogens and Virulence
6. Rapid Evolution and Speciation
​7. Temporal Partitioning

Stochastic

1. Priority Effects
2. Community Assembly (if drift > selection)
3. Neutral Theory
This is where I think microbial ecologists can vastly expand our understanding of the tremendous microbial diversity. For instance, niche partitioning requires relating traits to phylogeny which should reflect differential environmental distributions. Often, this requires quantifying traits of closely-related bacteria as the competitive exclusion principle predicts a limitation to niche differences. Furthermore, huge efforts are being made to quantify the relative impacts of deterministic v. stochastic processes in microbial studies, both from theoretical frameworks [3] to experimental [4].

Papers:

1. Fierer N & Jackson RB. (2006). The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proceedings to the National Academy of Sciences 103(3): 626-631.

2. Chase AB & Martiny JBH. (2018). The importance of resolving biogeographic patterns of microbial microdiversity. Microbiology Australia 39(1): 5-8.

3. Ning D, Deng Y, Tiedje JM, Zhou J. (2019). A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity. Proceedings to the National Academy of Sciences 116(34): 16892-16898.

​4. Albright MBN, Chase AB, Martiny JBH. (2019). Experimental evidence that stochasticity contributes to bacterial composition and functioning in a decomposer community. mBio 10:e00568-19.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Some thoughts on some (small) things

    Archives

    November 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Tweets by microbomics
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Recent News
  • Research Projects
  • Lab Members
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact